An SMSF bought a an off-the-plan property and simultaneously extended a loan of $214,550 to the builder, secured by a Term Promissory Note. The note states that repayment of the principal amount will only be due if construction is not completed within a tree years of signing the purchase contract, along with interest at a specified rate. If construction is completed, no repayment is required.
To determine if this transaction is on commercial terms or constitutes a non-arm's length transaction, your guidance is needed.
It is also important to ascertain if a Caveat should be lodged on the property for security purposes, if monthly repayments and interest are necessary, and if a loan agreement is preferable over the current promissory note.
Alos wondering if a Secured Promissory note is enough documentary evidence for this loan
In terms of the security, the promissory note stats
"1. AGREEMENT:(a) As security for the performance of the Note, Promisor hereby agrees to hold the Land for the purposes of the Construction (hereafter referred to as the “Collateral”); and(b) Promisee hereby agrees to make payment of the Loan 14 days after Promisee’s satisfaction of Special Condition 13 (Establishment of Self-Managed Super Fund) under the executed Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Land between the Promisee and Promisor or its related entity (the “Land Contract”)."
.png)

Hi Dawood
I have not seen this before or seen a promissory note held by a SMSF.
If anyone has experience in this issue please advise the forum.
As a starting point a SMSF could lend money to an unrelated party being a builder and the loan would not have to be paid if this is replaced by the Fund instead receiving an asset being the completed property.
This would need to be done on a commercial / arm's length arrangement to comply with section 109 of SIS.
Yes my view is that it would be commercial for the SMSF to take security over the property in relation to the loan to the builder. I would need to see the whole of the agreement re the promissory note to be able to comment on it.
Thanks
THE AUDITORS INSTITUTE